May 31, 2008, 05:05 PM // 17:05
|
#1
|
Pre-Searing Cadet
|
"Survivor Title Track" Suggestion
Hello. I would like to obtain your thoughts and feelings on the following suggestion:
"Why should the Survivor Title Track stop when you die once? I understand that it is the end of the "survival", however would it not be better for it to be continuously available? What I mean is that why not have the Title Track "reset" when you die? It would be a lot more useful in the sense of people could then concentrate on the title track later in the game or at least try again."
What do you think? Should this be put into the game updates?
|
|
|
May 31, 2008, 05:10 PM // 17:10
|
#2
|
Ascalonian Squire
|
/signed
i hate my survivor title and i was 20000xp approx away from 2nd rank and died and i've spent 120k+ on that char and don't want to start again
|
|
|
May 31, 2008, 05:12 PM // 17:12
|
#3
|
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: Mar 2008
Guild: Binge And Purge [HET]
Profession: D/W
|
survivor is about surviving, not dying and then surviving
/not signed
|
|
|
May 31, 2008, 05:20 PM // 17:20
|
#4
|
Emo Goth Italics
|
/No.
There has been other threads on this. (Several, actually)
|
|
|
May 31, 2008, 05:53 PM // 17:53
|
#5
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Nov 2006
Profession: A/N
|
Here's my suggestion- leave it as it is.
DISCUSS
|
|
|
May 31, 2008, 05:55 PM // 17:55
|
#6
|
Pre-Searing Cadet
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Panais
survivor is about surviving, not dying and then surviving
/not signed
|
I disagree strongly. You can still be a survivor even if you have died because a survivor is classed for living for a long period of time. So, even if you die, it classes as theoretically another life, thus it should reset. You said it yourself "dying and then surviving." You still classed it as surviving.
|
|
|
May 31, 2008, 05:55 PM // 17:55
|
#7
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SATown~Tx
Guild: Guild Hopper!
Profession: R/
|
/notsigned
or else it would of already been added.....
|
|
|
May 31, 2008, 05:57 PM // 17:57
|
#8
|
Ooo, pretty flower
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Citadel of the Decayed
Guild: The Archivists' Sanctum [Lore]
Profession: N/
|
Multiple ideas, multiple times suggested.
The only change to survivor I can agree with would be one that I saw a long time ago. It suggested that once a character reaches Legendary Suvivor, when they go to put it in the HoM, they can make an item, untradable, and put that in the storage, to then put in another character's HoM. The same suggestion was made for LDoA in that thread as well. Once the "title" is added to a HoM, it will be unable to be put in another. That way, that one time of getting LDoA or LS would only count once, and cannot be changed once put in a hall, nor be traded to others.
The point of survival is to not die, if it was changed to die then restart, then every single person can get it through a few UW/FoW Ursan runs *for those who want the challenge, or just simply HFFF/Dwarven Boxing *for those who want the title*. I personally would love the chance to be able to get survivor on my sin, as that would help his HoM, or just simply to reset his deaths, but I still say no to that.
Change it to this, and every single character can easily get it. Although it would be "fair" to the characters that existed before the Survivor title, I only can agree with what I stated in the first paragraph, and I say that can happen with both Survivor and LDoA.
/notsigned
Last edited by Konig Des Todes; May 31, 2008 at 06:00 PM // 18:00..
|
|
|
May 31, 2008, 06:05 PM // 18:05
|
#9
|
Pre-Searing Cadet
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Azazel The Assassin
Multiple ideas, multiple times suggested.
The only change to survivor I can agree with would be one that I saw a long time ago. It suggested that once a character reaches Legendary Suvivor, when they go to put it in the HoM, they can make an item, untradable, and put that in the storage, to then put in another character's HoM. The same suggestion was made for LDoA in that thread as well. Once the "title" is added to a HoM, it will be unable to be put in another. That way, that one time of getting LDoA or LS would only count once, and cannot be changed once put in a hall, nor be traded to others.
The point of survival is to not die, if it was changed to die then restart, then every single person can get it through a few UW/FoW Ursan runs *for those who want the challenge, or just simply HFFF/Dwarven Boxing *for those who want the title*. I personally would love the chance to be able to get survivor on my sin, as that would help his HoM, or just simply to reset his deaths, but I still say no to that.
Change it to this, and every single character can easily get it. Although it would be "fair" to the characters that existed before the Survivor title, I only can agree with what I stated in the first paragraph, and I say that can happen with both Survivor and LDoA.
/notsigned
|
Thank-you for actually explaining your opinion opposed to just saying "No". I agree that everyone could get it, however would everyone have the patience to do so? Maybe it should be possible that deaths reset when a campaign is completed or 1,000,000 XP is obtained - some high boundary could be used in order to reset the deaths and make it possible on our favorite characters.
It is a title track designed as a "challenge" to experience players, however I believe that it should be continuously open to all players, but still difficult to obtain. It is always extremely unfortunate when you are level 19 and you die, so you get no title what-so-ever.
It would however be nice to know some times on how oneself could actually obtain this particular title track. Does anyone have any tips?
Last edited by Flying-Eagle; May 31, 2008 at 06:11 PM // 18:11..
|
|
|
May 31, 2008, 06:13 PM // 18:13
|
#10
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Jul 2007
Guild: [IG]
Profession: R/
|
/unsigned
The survivor track is from character creation to first death and thats the way it should stay.
It's far too easy to farm XP's for very little risk that virtually every character would become a Survivor(3) with a few hours work and make the whole track pretty much more worthless than it has become already.
|
|
|
May 31, 2008, 06:26 PM // 18:26
|
#11
|
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: Jan 2008
Guild: Spartas Greatest Heroes [WAR]
Profession: D/A
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aldric
/unsigned
The survivor track is from character creation to first death and thats the way it should stay.
It's far too easy to farm XP's for very little risk that virtually every character would become a Survivor(3) with a few hours work and make the whole track pretty much more worthless than it has become already.
|
/unsigned
Exactly what he said.....if the title track would just reset itself every time somebody died, then eventually ever person in the game would have the Legendary Survivor (3) title, making it a worthless title, that you wouldn't feel proud of when you got it, cause almost every other person has it.
|
|
|
May 31, 2008, 06:30 PM // 18:30
|
#12
|
Emo Goth Italics
|
Eagle, the reasons are in previous Survivor Title Suggestions.
|
|
|
May 31, 2008, 07:31 PM // 19:31
|
#13
|
Ascalonian Squire
Join Date: Apr 2008
Guild: Aria of the Apocalypse
Profession: R/
|
Why not put a limit on the possible amount of resets, a reasonable figure, such as three?
And each reset increases the required amount of experience to reach rank three, at incrememnts of 200,000 or more.
|
|
|
May 31, 2008, 07:47 PM // 19:47
|
#14
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Southern California
Profession: R/Mo
|
/notsigned for obvious reasons
|
|
|
May 31, 2008, 07:47 PM // 19:47
|
#15
|
Pre-Searing Cadet
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taiya
Why not put a limit on the possible amount of resets, a reasonable figure, such as three?
And each reset increases the required amount of experience to reach rank three, at incrememnts of 200,000 or more.
|
I totally agree. This would be fantastic.
|
|
|
May 31, 2008, 09:24 PM // 21:24
|
#16
|
Desert Nomad
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: that dwarven house in beacons perch
Guild: koss
Profession: W/
|
/signed, this has been suggested with many threads and many good suggestions to change the title, but anet will prob never change it....
The biggest issue is not so much that "oh u died u shouldnt be able to do it again" as much as many people's characters were created far in advance of this title being created, and therefore those people want a chance to get the title on their main characters who had died before the title existed.
|
|
|
May 31, 2008, 09:34 PM // 21:34
|
#17
|
Furnace Stoker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Guild: Our Crabs Know True [LOVE]
Profession: R/
|
Search is your friend. Use it, then respond to one of the 4577534768764245 other topics about this.
/signed for a lock
/unsigned for a change
|
|
|
Jun 01, 2008, 07:12 AM // 07:12
|
#18
|
I like yumy food!
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Where I can eat yumy food
Guild: Dead Alley [dR]
Profession: Mo/R
|
Doing a search for other threads like this would help.
|
|
|
Jun 01, 2008, 08:49 AM // 08:49
|
#19
|
Furnace Stoker
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: behind you
Guild: bumble bee
Profession: E/
|
/signed if this is not done then i suggest the below
/signed for removal of survival title if the character ever dies because according to the logic of surviving, the character is not suppose to die even once. not before not after.
|
|
|
Jun 01, 2008, 11:08 PM // 23:08
|
#20
|
Wark!!!
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Florida
Profession: W/
|
Maybe there should be a minimum number of posts required to create a new thread in this forum... say 10K.
EDIT: Anyways this has been asked so many times it isn't funny. The horse has been dead and no amount of beating will bring it back.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:35 PM // 16:35.
|